Hi, Alfredo Tupone <tup...@gentoo.org> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Alfredo Tupone <tup...@gentoo.org>
> ---
> eclass/toolchain.eclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
> index fd820f60f45d..f8e06fa39884 100644
> --- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass
> +++ b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
> @@ -2495,31 +2495,31 @@ should_we_gcc_config() {
> #
> # Also add a hook so special ebuilds (kgcc64) can control which languages
> # exactly get enabled
> gcc-lang-supported() {
> grep ^language=\"${1}\" "${S}"/gcc/*/config-lang.in > /dev/null ||
> return 1
> [[ -z ${TOOLCHAIN_ALLOWED_LANGS} ]] && return 0
> has $1 ${TOOLCHAIN_ALLOWED_LANGS}
> }
>
> _tc_use_if_iuse() {
> in_iuse $1 && use $1
> }
>
> is_ada() {
> gcc-lang-supported ada || return 1
> - _tc_use_if_iuse ada
> + _tc_use_if_iuse cxx && _tc_use_if_iuse ada
Is this redundant? Would gcc-lang-supported c++ (called through the ada
support check) not suffice?
> }
>
> is_cxx() {
> gcc-lang-supported 'c++' || return 1
> _tc_use_if_iuse cxx
> }
>
> is_d() {
> gcc-lang-supported d || return 1
> _tc_use_if_iuse d
> }
>
> is_f77() {
> gcc-lang-supported f77 || return 1
> _tc_use_if_iuse fortran
--
Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
