On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 15:04 -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote: > Sent to devrel@ before realizing it was rather more appropriate here, my > bad. Forwarding. > > > > Today's devrel meeting confirmed the pending conflict resolution RFC > (http://dev.gentoo.org/~avenj/Devrel_ConflictResRoadmap), thus it's time > to determine member selection. Attached are my thoughts on the subject > for discussion. > > >
To stimulate conversation, I'll just add that I believe this accurately reflects what we determined in the meeting to be the best way to proceed, unless objections, problems we didn't think of, etc. > RFC > Selecting/removing conflict resolution subproject members > > - Initial member selection > The initial conflict resolution lead should be chosen via a short > nomination period & voting. The lead should then compose a list of four > primary board members. Once the list is presented to devrel for review, > objections may be raised and the final list will be voted on. > > - Conflict of interest rotation > > For each complaint filed, devrel leads & conflict resolution lead > are expected to speak with board members to examine any conflict of > interest issues. Members determined to have a conflict of interest > should be rotated out and replacements chosen for the interim. At the > conflict resolution lead's discretion, members rotated out may be > brought back on or remain in reserve after the pending action is > complete. > > - Complaints & removal > Complaints raised about conflict resolution members may be raised > to leads or at devrel meetings for discussion at any time. Devrel-wide > votes may be taken to remove members from the project under extreme > circumstances. Members may also be removed at the subproject lead's > discretion with an explanation to devrel. > > -- > Jon Portnoy > avenj/irc.freenode.net Regards, Ferris -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
