fox2mike    06/04/04 12:14:14

  Modified:             distcc.xml
  Log:
  Put in a patch given by Lisa Seelye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to clarify the 
Troubleshooting section

Revision  Changes    Path
1.35                 xml/htdocs/doc/en/distcc.xml

file : 
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/doc/en/distcc.xml?rev=1.35&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=gentoo
plain: 
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/doc/en/distcc.xml?rev=1.35&content-type=text/plain&cvsroot=gentoo
diff : 
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/doc/en/distcc.xml.diff?r1=1.34&r2=1.35&cvsroot=gentoo

Index: distcc.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/distcc.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35
--- distcc.xml  21 Feb 2006 16:50:58 -0000      1.34
+++ distcc.xml  4 Apr 2006 12:14:14 -0000       1.35
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd">
-<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/distcc.xml,v 1.34 
2006/02/21 16:50:58 jkt Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/distcc.xml,v 1.35 
2006/04/04 12:14:14 fox2mike Exp $ -->
 
 <guide link="/doc/en/distcc.xml">
 
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
 <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 -->
 <license/>
 
-<version>1.15</version>
-<date>2006-02-18</date>
+<version>1.16</version>
+<date>2006-04-04</date>
 
 <chapter>
 <title>Introduction</title>
@@ -338,14 +338,14 @@
 <chapter>
 <title>Troubleshooting</title>
 <section>
-<title>Mozilla and Xorg</title>
+<title>Some Packages Don't Use Distcc</title>
 <body>
 
 <p>
 As you emerge various packages, you'll notice that some of them aren't being
-distributed (and aren't being built in parallel).  This is because the
-developers of the Mozilla and Xorg-X11 ebuilds intentionally disable parallel
-building because it is known to cause problems.
+distributed (and aren't being built in parallel). This may happen because the
+package's Makefile doesn't support parallel operations or the maintainer of the
+ebuild has explicitly disabled parallel operations due to a known problem.
 </p>
 
 <p>



-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to