nightmorph 07/08/13 00:57:57 Modified: gcc-optimization.xml Log: slightly revised stance on ldflags per leio's request on irc. (darned ricers! :p)
Revision Changes Path 1.9 xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?rev=1.9&view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?rev=1.9&content-type=text/plain diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?r1=1.8&r2=1.9 Index: gcc-optimization.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- gcc-optimization.xml 7 Aug 2007 06:12:07 -0000 1.8 +++ gcc-optimization.xml 13 Aug 2007 00:57:57 -0000 1.9 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> -<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v 1.8 2007/08/07 06:12:07 nightmorph Exp $ --> +<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v 1.9 2007/08/13 00:57:57 nightmorph Exp $ --> <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd"> @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 --> <license/> -<version>1.5</version> -<date>2007-08-06</date> +<version>1.6</version> +<date>2007-08-12</date> <chapter> <title>Introduction</title> @@ -558,12 +558,12 @@ <body> <p> -Don't use them. You may have heard that they can speed up application load times -or reduce binary size, but in reality, LDFLAGS are more likely to make your -applications stop working. They are not supported, and you may have your bugs -closed and marked INVALID if you report errors with packages while using -LDFLAGS. At the very least you will have to recompile all affected packages -without setting LDFLAGS. +You probably shouldn't set them. You may have heard that they can speed up +application load times or reduce binary size, but they can also make your +applications stop working entirely. They are not officially supported, and you +may have your bugs closed and marked INVALID if you report errors with packages +while using LDFLAGS. At the very least you will have to recompile all affected +packages without setting LDFLAGS. </p> </body> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
