neysx 08/03/01 14:15:57 Added: hb-install-filesystems.xml Log: #179796 tone down ReiserFS desc, recommend ext3 and cut some cruft
Revision Changes Path 1.1 xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-install-filesystems.xml file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-install-filesystems.xml?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-install-filesystems.xml?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain Index: hb-install-filesystems.xml =================================================================== <?xml version='1.0' encoding="UTF-8"?> <!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-install-filesystems.xml,v 1.1 2008/03/01 14:15:57 neysx Exp $ --> <!DOCTYPE included SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd"> <included> <version>1</version> <date>2008-03-01</date> <section id="filesystemsdesc"> <title>Filesystems</title> <body> <p test="contains('x86 Alpha',func:keyval('arch'))"> The Linux kernel supports various filesystems. We'll explain ext2, ext3, ReiserFS, XFS and JFS as these are the most commonly used filesystems on Linux systems. </p> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='IA64'"> The Linux kernel supports various filesystems. We'll explain vfat, ext2, ext3, ReiserFS, XFS and JFS as these are the most commonly used filesystems on Linux systems. </p> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='AMD64'"> Several filesystems are available. Some of them are found stable on the amd64 architecture, others aren't. The following filesystems are found to be stable: ext2 and ext3. jfs and reiserfs may work but need more testing. If you're really adventurous you can try the unsupported filesystems. </p> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='arm'"> Several filesystems are available. Some of them are found stable on the arm architecture, others aren't. ext2 and ext3 are found to be stable. JFS and ReiserFS may work but need more testing. If you're really adventurous you can try the unsupported filesystems. </p> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='HPPA'"> Several filesystems are available. Ext2, ext3, XFS and reiserfs are found stable on the HPPA architecture. The others are very experimental. </p> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='MIPS'"> Several filesystems are available. ReiserFS, EXT2 and EXT3 are found stable on the MIPS architectures, others are experimental. </p> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='PPC'"> Several filesystems are available for use on the PowerPC architecture including ext2, ext3, ReiserFS and XFS, each with their strengths and faults. </p> <note test="func:keyval('arch')='PPC64'"> Several filesystems are available. ext2, ext3 and ReiserFS support is built in the Installation CD kernels. JFS and XFS support is available through kernel modules. </note> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='SPARC'"> Several filesystems are available, some are known to be stable on the SPARC architecture. Ext2 and ext3, for example, are known to work well. Alternate filesystems may not function correctly. </p> <note test="func:keyval('arch')='Alpha'"> <c>aboot</c> only supports booting from <b>ext2</b> and <b>ext3</b> partitions. </note> </body> <body> <p test="func:keyval('arch')='IA64'"> <b>vfat</b> is the MS-DOS filesystem, updated to allow long filenames. It is also the only filesystem type that the EFI firmware on ia64 systems understands. The boot partition on ia64 systems should always be vfat, but for your data partitions you should use one of the other filesystems listed below. </p> <p> <b>ext2</b> is the tried and true Linux filesystem but doesn't have metadata journaling, which means that routine ext2 filesystem checks at startup time can be quite time-consuming. There is now quite a selection of newer-generation journaled filesystems that can be checked for consistency very quickly and are thus generally preferred over their non-journaled counterparts. Journaled filesystems prevent long delays when you boot your system and your filesystem happens to be in an inconsistent state. </p> <p> <b>ext3</b> is the journaled version of the ext2 filesystem, providing metadata journaling for fast recovery in addition to other enhanced journaling modes like full data and ordered data journaling. It uses an HTree index that enables high performance in almost all situations. In short, ext3 is a very good and reliable filesystem. Ext3 is the recommended all-purpose all-platform filesystem. </p> </body> <body test="not(func:keyval('arch')='SPARC')"> <p test="not(func:keyval('arch')='PPC')"> <b>JFS</b> is IBM's high-performance journaling filesystem. JFS is a light, fast and reliable B+tree-based filesystem with good performance in various conditions. </p> <p> <b>ReiserFS</b> is a B+tree-based journaled filesystem that has good overall performance, especially when dealing with many tiny files at the cost of more CPU cycles. ReiserFS appears to be less maintained than other filesystems. </p> <p> <b>XFS</b> is a filesystem with metadata journaling which comes with a robust feature-set and is optimized for scalability. XFS seems to be less forgiving to various hardware problems. </p> </body> </section> </included> -- [email protected] mailing list
