nightmorph 09/08/12 02:41:38 Modified: utf-8.xml Log: What the heck is this reference to XFree86 still here? We haven't offered a choice between xfree and x11 in years, so we should quit pretending we do. punted.
Revision Changes Path 1.51 xml/htdocs/doc/en/utf-8.xml file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/utf-8.xml?rev=1.51&view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/utf-8.xml?rev=1.51&content-type=text/plain diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/utf-8.xml?r1=1.50&r2=1.51 Index: utf-8.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/utf-8.xml,v retrieving revision 1.50 retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -r1.50 -r1.51 --- utf-8.xml 10 Oct 2008 17:42:15 -0000 1.50 +++ utf-8.xml 12 Aug 2009 02:41:38 -0000 1.51 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ <?xml version='1.0' encoding="UTF-8"?> -<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/utf-8.xml,v 1.50 2008/10/10 17:42:15 jkt Exp $ --> +<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/utf-8.xml,v 1.51 2009/08/12 02:41:38 nightmorph Exp $ --> <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd"> <guide link="/doc/en/utf-8.xml"> @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 --> <license /> -<version>2.27</version> -<date>2008-10-10</date> +<version>2.28</version> +<date>2009-08-11</date> <chapter> <title>Character Encodings</title> @@ -505,11 +505,6 @@ <title>X11 and Fonts</title> <body> -<impo> -<c>x11-base/xorg-x11</c> has far better support for Unicode than XFree86 -and is <e>highly</e> recommended. -</impo> - <p> TrueType fonts have support for Unicode, and most of the fonts that ship with Xorg have impressive character support, although, obviously, not every single
