bug #80110 filed
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 00:01 +0100, Sander Knopper wrote: > Well, like I said, midnight commander is the only application thats linked > with glib2 and I haven't noticed any problems at all. Whether those are > segfaults or anything else. > > I also haven't had any feedback from user using my hobby distribution > regarding this issue. > > > Sander Knopper > > On Saturday 29 January 2005 23:51, Ned Ludd wrote: > > Do you notice random segfaults in any of the apps that were linked with > > glib2? > > qpkg -q -f /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so > > > > On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 23:49 +0100, Sander Knopper wrote: > > > What kind of feedback do you want? > > > > > > I mean, I've applied the patches and compiled glib which was needed by > > > midnight commander and everything works fine. So do you need any extra > > > information? > > > > > > > > > Sander Knopper > > > > > > On Saturday 29 January 2005 23:44, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > > See First: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-embedded&m=109987525606716&w=2 > > > > > > > > Current Status: > > > > We are stuck in a standstill as I've never gotten *runtime* feedback > > > > from anybody about these glib2 patches. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:10 -0400, Scott Syms wrote: > > > > > Hi, folks- > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to install an embedded-gentoo system with xfce, but I'm > > > > > getting hung up on the availability of iconv(). glib is looking for > > > > > it, and I understand that gtk will further on in the emerge process. > > > > > > > > > > From looking at the uclibc configuration prompts, I understood that > > > > > uclibc had iconv features: is it that they're not enabled in the > > > > > default emerge? I've tried adding the iconv use flag and it makes no > > > > > difference with the uclibc build. > > > > > > > > > > I've tried commenting out the libiconv out of the package.mask file, > > > > > but the compile fails with ld: cannot open output file .libs/: is a > > > > > directory. > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone give me any context for this and perhaps a way forward? > > > > > > > > > > tks > > > > > S > > > > > Halifax, NS > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > [email protected] mailing list > > -- > [email protected] mailing list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
