Its designed for routers, firewalls, small servers without harddisk.
I need the disk for p2p temp files... But the idea of having all the software in ram is very appealing... Also, the usb ports come from a pci card that i bought so i think (never tested it) that it won't boot from usb, only floppy.
They are slow. For fast boots, i'd try to make initng work. (but its big)
I don't mind, i still have space :) But i still have a problem: my ADSL modem is USB, and when i boot the pc the modem requires a firmware to be downloaded into it. The normal baselayout doesn't do that (or the pc takes too long and the modem times out or maybe a bug??) in due time, so it's a question that i have to cover, nevertheless, i'll try your baselayout. Do i have to install anything besides the source package?
You can probably reuse parts of it. The source package is here: http://tanael.org/alpine/baselayout-alpine/baselayout-alpine-0.9.6.tar.gz
Thanks!! 2006/6/28, Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:56 +0100, Marcelo Coelho wrote: > What about a bootchart? Is there one available? no sorry. > My system is a normal stripped down gentoo install (for now). I'm > making some scripts to make the build process automatic in a build > host and create a tarball with it. My pc doesn't boot from cd-rom... > :( Does it boot from usb? http://tanael.org/alpine/v1.1/usbdrive/ Does it boot from floppy? there are floppy images on the iso that will load the kernel from floppy, cdrom drivers and then load the rest from cdrom. > (When i'm satisfied with the results i'll post an how-to at > gentoo-wiki. :) ). So what i want is stability and boot up speed. > I don't test initng for a while, and when i did i didn't had good > results, but for what i want it _may_ be good enough, but if the boot > time is similar to your baselayout, i'll use it instead... They are slow. For fast boots, i'd try to make initng work. (but its big) Might be that its fast enough for you if you dont need the coldplugging. > In the mean time, what you want to say with "But its designed to load > binary packages to ram > during boot, LEAF style." ? It means that is pulls in runtime packages during boot to a tmpfs. All runtimes (binary pacakges) are loaded into ram during boot instead of the classical livecd approch where you mount a squashfs or uninonfs on a cdrom. The drawback is long boot times (you need to install all your packages every time you boot) The benefit is you prevent delays caused by cdrom spinning up (everything is in ram so responsetimes should even be faster than from disk) and you can do (security) updates without rebooting. Its designed for routers, firewalls, small servers without harddisk. > > Thanks! > > > > > 2006/6/28, Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 07:46 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 11:09 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:53 +0100, Marcelo Coelho wrote: > > > > > > no not at all. the baselayout-lite one does not depend on bash what so > > > > > > ever and includes pretty much no init/conf scripts. You get to hack on > > > > > > your own init scripts, which is a trivial task. > > > > > > > > > > Well, i have to use a different baselayout. The boot time is far too > > > > > long to be acceptable and there is a problem with hotplug (an error > > > > > appears that the firmware isn't available). But i don't know if it's > > > > > easier to make my init scripts or use initng. > > > > > > > > I have made a baselyaout with a stripped down version of runscript that > > > > will run the many init.d script from gentoo out of the box. > > > > > > > > Let me know if you are interested and I'll send you the sources > > > > > > > > > Does not depend on bash? > > > > no > > > > > Works with ash? :) > > > > yes :) > > > > or... I'm actually using dash currently because coldplugging takes like > > 3 minutes with ash and 5 seconds with dash. (its fixed in next release > > of busybox so I'll drop dash) > > > > > If so I think we would all be interested in moving fwd in that > > > direction. Feel like putting together an updated baselayout-lite ebuild? > > > > I have one already. But its designed to load binary packages to ram > > during boot, LEAF style. > > > > rsync://tanael.org/alpine-portage/sys-apps/baselayout-alpine/ > > > > You can probably reuse parts of it. The source package is here: > > http://tanael.org/alpine/baselayout-alpine/baselayout-alpine-0.9.6.tar.gz > > > > I kind of immitate runlevels, (using rc0.d, rc1.d etc) but the big > > difference from normal sysv is that *all* runlevels or "boot stages" are > > executed. > > > > I had to patch some of the init.d scripts. Typically it was replacing: > > > > if [ expr && expr ] ... > > > > with: > > > > if [ expr ] && [ expr ] ... > > > > If we could get the init.d script writers to try to not be too bashish, > > it would be great. > > > > If there is interrest I could dump my patches somwhere. > > > > If you want to see it in action, try: > > http://tanael.org/alpine/v1.1/iso/alpine-1.1.3_beta8-060622-i386.iso > > > > Its 125Mb > > > > > > -- > > [email protected] mailing list > > > > > -- > [email protected] mailing list > -- [email protected] mailing list
-- [email protected] mailing list
