Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote on 2011/11/11 17:01:28: > > On Friday 11 November 2011 10:47:02 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote on 2011/11/11 15:46:44: > > > On Friday 11 November 2011 03:26:22 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > I installed binutils > > > > and now I got a the correct libbfd.so and libiberty.a under > > > > > > > > /usr/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu/usr/lib/binutils/powerpc-softfloat-li > > > > nux- > > > > > > > > gnu/2.16.1/ There is no symlink under > > > > > > > > /usr/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu/lib/ > > > > > > > > though which forces me to pass -L and -I options too gcc in order to > > > > build oprofile. Would be nice if the symlinks were created to make the > > > > x-compile env. mimic the normal host env. > > > > > > try running: > > > ROOT=/usr/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu binutils-config 1 > > > > :) that got me > > /usr/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/powerpc-softfloat-l > > inux-gnu/lib/libiberty.a -> > > /usr/lib/binutils/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu/2.16.1/libiberty.a > > > > but this is a host arch libiberty.a so can't use it for x-compile :( > > hmm, yeah, that's because binutils-config doesn't use relative symlinks. i > wonder if relative would be fine since it isn't crossing the /usr boundary ...
Possibly, can't think of a reason not to. > > > > No sign of any new libiberty.h header files though. > > Did I miss something? > > you might also have to manually set CHOST otherwise binutils-config will think > it's setting up a cross-compiler. > > CHOST=powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu \ > ROOT=/usr/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu \ > binutils-config 1 Nope, that didn't change anything Jocke
