On Aug 7, 2005, at 11:01, Grobian wrote:
Hasan Khalil wrote:divides up the packages, I left him to do his thing. To save you the trouble, here's the important stuff:macos $ grep -R java . ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08 ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.08 ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08 ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.08 ./virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk ./virtuals:virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jre-bin ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5 ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04 ./progressive/virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdkFrom this grep it looks to me like the problem is still the same. virtuals/jdk is satisfied by dev-java/sun-j2sdk, but 10.3 and 10.4 only provide dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08. So basically, the problem is still there, or I and repoman don't seem to understand properly how this works (which is most properly in this case).
You're right. I'm sorry, and I stand corrected.Looking at the dev-java/sun-jdk ebuilds, it provides both virtual/jdk and vritual/jre; I really don't see a point with having dev-java/sun- jre-bin in the picture at all, given this. I think, then, that the proper solution should be as such:
virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdk virtuals:virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jdk */package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08
Kito: Any input? Is the above alright on your end?? -- Hasan Khalil eBuild and Porting Co-Lead Gentoo for Mac OS X
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
