On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Kito wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Grobian wrote:
>
> On a somewhat related note, we need to decide sooner than later on how
> distinguish between the collision-protect and non-collision-protected
> profiles in ebuilds, as some things that are getting in the tree break
> with a proper gentoo environment, mostly auto{conf,make} issues at the
> moment (-a -c -f stuff, etc) , as well as python issues creeping up as
> well, but this will probably get more convoluted very shortly...
Convoluted? That would be my cue :-p
I'll assume that the darwin profile has prefix /, with no special PATH,
while the "portage for os x/second class citizen" profile gets prefix
(say) /opt/gentoo, and PATH prepended with /opt/gentoo/bin:/opt/gentoo/...
[1].
Now, if an ebuild needs to know that it has "2nd class" status, wouldn't a
use flag be appropriate? And if you were to implement such a use flag,
could it not be useful to other second-class citizens? For example, in
"portage for non-Gentoo Linux" or "portage for solaris" profiles.
-f
[1] On reflection, I agree with grobian. I don't think it makes sense to
try and support an appended PATH (though it may be useful for some as an
unsupported option.)
> --Kito
>
> >
> >--
> >Fabian Groffen
> >eBuild && Porting
> >Gentoo for Mac OS X
> >--
> >[email protected] mailing list
> >
>
>
--
[email protected] mailing list
