On 12/14/05, Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14-12-2005 22:29:36 +0100, Dirk Schnberger wrote: > > > > Further on, I think Gentoo is more than a stand alone system, because it > > > > installs other standalone applications. > > > > This seems to be some mismatch. > > > > > I don't understand what you're trying to say here. > > > > If I underood this correctly, the idea is to use /Library/Gentoo as a prefix > > for the prospective prefixed install. > > But the packages which should be installed don't really belong to Gentoo, it > > merely works as some kind of installer. > > So I don't think /Library/Gentoo is really appropriate. > > Ok. > To be honest, I don't really care about the name, but I don't feel like > having huge discussions about it either. We just chose something more > sexy than /sw. Besides that, having chosen a default, doesn't mean you > need to use it. We could name it like > /Library/GentooPortageInstalledPackages, but that really looks ugly in > your paths. Luckly there is shell completion, but it still is a bit too > ugly to me. > Finally, this is just a minor side issue, that I feel is completely > irrelevant regarding the state of the project.
Amen. -- [email protected] mailing list
