Ok, I'm running into the consistancy message that Haubi mentioned.
I've prefix set to
/data1/portage/dec15/prefix
but the toolsbox prefix (is that the correct nomenclature?) (I'll call
it PREFIX2) is:
/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu
I'll need to trace through to see whats happening. My make.conf in
PREFIX2/etc is not being read even though I modify it....
I'm sure I'm forgetting something somewhere... I'll step through to
see what I find.
On 12/15/05, m h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user
> currently, only the group). So in portage_data.py, I override
> portage_uid to my userid
> portage_uid=os.getuid()
> and I'm rolling again.
> Now I get the following:
>
> Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/libc
> Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/linux-sources
> Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/os-headers
> !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
>
> PORTDIR /usr/portage
> --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating system dependencies
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9".
>
>
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for >=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9
> !!! Depgraph creation failed.
> =========END OUTPUT============
> Note the debug statement for PORTDIR, it is not prefixed!
> I have the following set in make.conf:
> PORTDIR=${PREFIX}/usr/portage
> Am I missing something?
>
> I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).
>
> Hopefully people don't mind the spam. Again, I'm not a gentoo dev, so
> I'm learning about the guts of portage, hopefully this is useful (at
> least as psuedo-dev notes) for someone else....
>
--
[email protected] mailing list
