On Sunday 30 January 2005 13:33, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > I don't see a need to drop the revision componently immediately. It > makes more sense to me to run with what's happening at the moment and > to move to a saner versioning scheme on the next non-bugfix release - > ie to 2.1.0. > Why not use the patchlevel mechanism. So have the next release be portage-2.0.51_p16.ebuild. This would mean a small change and still introduce some sanity from the ebuild perspective. Of course this does not say that such a version number is the sanest kind there is.
Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpoueJmw9YRq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
