On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:59:42 +0200 (CEST) > "Matthias Waechter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Brian Harring wrote: > > >>>Where do you get the filename from if not SRC_URI? > > >> > > >> Additional metadata tagged in, or mangling of the syntax in some > > >> way. > > > > > > I don't want to imagine how ugly that will get, syntax mangling will > > > probably break things and additional metadata needs a way to > > > properly map entries. > > > > SRC_URI="rename:${PN}-${PV}.tar.bz2:http://and-so-on/" > > > > or add some slashes after rename to fit whatever slashy syntax. > > Breaks anything that assumes that SRC_URI is actually a (list of) URI. > fetch() might not be so hard to adjust, but there are many more tools > involved. Not a good idea to change semantics of established > datastructures (especially if it's only a workaround for broken > upstream packages). EAPI change...
/me goes back to what he was doing and leaves people to come up with a sane proposal ~harring
pgpj4gIVaCm8v.pgp
Description: PGP signature