On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:42:56 -0600 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:32:35PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > Replace 2.1.0 with 2.2.0 and I'll agree. > Skipping 2.1 accomplishes what? Avoid any possible confusion about what 2.1 is. > People asking, "whoah there, it's a later version then 2.1, where's > the 2.1 functionality?" will still occur. I don't think so. > *cough* this is why alpha/feature releases should be date tagged > against the branch point instead of the potential version. :) sorry, I don't understand this sentence. How would you have named the alpha snapshot? Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
