Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
So... thoughts? I'm not much for making portage depend on tarsync
just for emerge-webrsync improvements, would rather chunk the bugger
out.
How about runtime detection?
runtime detection is questionable from my standpoint, since while
coding for it is good, without hard dep pulling it in the only folks
who will ever have a faster emerge-webrsync are those who happen to
know the hidden trick to merge tarsync.
Well, how do you plan to inform users of the splitted package for
webrsync? Could just do the same for tarsync instead, or for example if
no tarsync is found print a nice little message about "falling back to
slow default, emerge tarsync to avoid".
Marius
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
