On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 19:56:41 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 23:32 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > so we've found some cases where a package installs objects that > > either need to be ignored by some of the scanelf checks ... > > > > ... > > > > what this e-mail is about is naming convention ... i'm thinking > > that an ebuild sets up a variable with a list of relative paths to > > $D of files that should be skipped for various checks ... so with > > slmodem, we'd have like: QA_EXEC_STACK="usr/sbin/slmodemd > > usr/sbin/slmodem_test" > > > > if, in the future, we need to add an ignore list for TEXTRELs, we'd > > use QA_TEXTRELS="...." > > This becomes tricky when looking at tests across all CHOSTs. > What holds true for one arch defiantly is not the case for others. This could be done via the profiles, perhaps - package.qa, something like package.mask/use/keywords: net-dialup/slmodem QA_EXECSTACK="..." QA_TEXTRELS="..." -- Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
