On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Andrei Slavoiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I want to raise a issue with the way that > package integrity verification is done by portage. For > an example of such an issue see bug 136742. > The idea is that portage now checks the Manifest as a > whole, not allowing a version of the package to be > emerged if any of the files mentioned by the Manifest > fail the verification. This makes unstable ebuilds > wich change often and have a tendency to break from > time to time prevent the emerge of a stable version of > the same package. > Do you think there is any way to fix this in portage? This isn't exactly new behavior with FEATURES=strict (which is the default setting). Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
