On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:34:44 -0500 Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For packages that are in the "system" set, wouldn't adding the
> contents of system.{,r}depend to {,R}DEPEND cause problems in dep
> resolution? Would there be a way to prevent the contents of these
> files from being added for packages that are themselves in these
> files?
Did you miss the part about RESTRICT=system-deps?
> How is the "system" set constructed from these files? Would they
> simply be concatenated (minus duplicates) and treated like the old
> "packages" file (minus the magic visibility filtering)?
Maybe, we'd have to see what works best.
Marius
--
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
