On Saturday 15 March 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:45:19 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i dont see it being any different from an ebuild declaring its own > > KEYWORDS. if you want to be lazy, then have a magic KEYWORD: +pmask. > > What's wrong with KEYWORDS="" ? (I'm not saying it's the perfect > solution, just looking for specific requirements)
no reason for masking. if you updated portage to parse the comment block above a KEYWORDS="" line, then i think that would work fine. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
