Duncan wrote: > Now remove sets don't work. What are the options? The most direct is to > simply create my own set listing everything I want, but that won't > account for anything added to the sets as they appear upstream over > time. What to do about that? > > I suppose I could create an update script that diffs the new kde-testing > set against a copy I stashed somewhere, thus showing me the differences, > and that I could then update my own set and the stashed copy of the > upstream set accordingly. Is that the best option under the > circumstances, or does portage provide some other replacement for the > functionality I just lost in that regard, with the loss of remove set > functionality?
There's no replacement for it yet, so yes, for now that seems like the best option if you need such fine-grained control. -- Thanks, Zac
