El lun, 28-05-2012 a las 00:49 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > On 05/27/2012 03:27 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > I have seen today a fixed bug that was only reproducible for people > > (like me) running without userpriv (but maintainer didn't found it > > before commiting because he was running with this feature enabled), I > > have also seen some packages skipping tests when not using userpriv. I > > am unsure then, why default is still to not use userpriv? > > I think it's not enabled by default just because there's always risk > involved in changing the defaults. I've been using it for years and I > don't remember experiencing any problems because of it. > > > I haven't > > found important bugs opened pointing regressions but, since it's still > > disabled by default, I am still running in the old way instead of using > > "userpriv usersandbox" :/ > > I plan to send an email to the gentoo-dev mailing list, to ask if there > are any objections to having FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" enabled by > default.
Well, thanks a lot :D It's really a pleasure to discuss with you :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
