On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:05:50PM +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 16/01/14 17:45, W. Trevor King wrote: > > I love Signed-off-by, but in all projects where I've seen it used > > it means the signer is agreeing to some form of a Developer's > > Certificate of Origin [1]. Without such a DCO, I think the usual > > commit author is sufficient. > > I agree. However, it might be prudent to introduce a DCO. After all, > copyright is assigned to the Gentoo Foundation.
If you add a DCO (and I'd certainly think that would be prudent if you require copyright assignment), then you probably don't need a separate Assisted-by. Anyone with enough co-authorship to matter will be using a Signed-off-by. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
