-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 13/08/14 19:59, Duncan wrote:
> * I don't want portage writing mask/use changes on its own under
> any circumstances, as I use directories and have my own idea of
> what files I want stuff in.
It never has, and these patches never have implemented this. You
raised the same concerns a year ago, and they did not make sense then
either.

> The patches as they are now would change that, giving me no way to
> still get the suggestions with --ask, without chancing the actual
> write of those changes.
The patches do not do that.

> The only other /possible/ objection I see is the potential
> version- dependent confusion over --autounmask behavior.
This is one of the reasons I am kind of neutral on applying them at
all at this point.

> But I don't feel strongly about that.
Me neither.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlPrsN8ACgkQRtClrXBQc7W1HgEApAThYm9jvpGDOeoczC67/3eY
ORcLtHG2c6UGoI3mwhgBALHfnxR4qJk19c8KeDK4H7d/9+g0O45ZAr/Gdo5Wf2z5
=l15a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to