On 11/24/2015 04:06 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2015 15:58, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 11/24/2015 03:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> This does not support fowners just yet as we'll need to queue/dequeue
>>> the accounts on the fly.
>>>
>>> X-Gentoo-Bug: 566614
>>> X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/566614
>>> ---
>>> man/make.conf.5 | 4 ++++
>>> pym/portage/const.py | 1 +
>>> pym/portage/package/ebuild/config.py | 22 +++++++++-------------
>>> pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py | 9 ++++++---
>>> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> In pym/repoman/qa_data.py you need to add userinstall to valid_restrict.
>>
>> Otherwise, looks good.
>
> suggestions for having fowners queue data ? should it just write to
> a file in $T and then have portage read commands out of that ?
> -mike
>
Yeah, that sounds good. A list of fowners/fperms calls should suffice.
We can parse it and translate it to python calls.
The data should be dequeued inside ${D}, so that the merge code can
handle things like administrative overrides:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396153
--
Thanks,
Zac
