-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 15/01/16 15:21, Michał Górny wrote: > You make it look like you noticed it before I pinged you about it! > :-P It was just a note for myself to fix it later or at least see to that someone else fixes it.
> Looks like the test relies on the phase outputting only whatever's > inside. Not sure how to proceed best. Should I push all that > output into stderr maybe, as a workaround? Or disable printing > sizes conditionally to verboseness level? I think 2 sounds OK. But the test is meant to catch a regression on fd_pipes; perhaps the test should be changed rather than the code. What do you think, Zac? - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWmQEhAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BnvkQAMqI9kDWeOSWZi/kuHAJJlvB YYOLSG/3VRrtnIqEOvvvEl/v50hFgnV/aO85h4UHJ8ZfFuxKDkPS/CVmLUNNA9xp dGYNXahXfcE5u3bhksoggTMdnmL0cthbm95/R48SHHwpcnfAgRv7YVuriuS7nujg gFqe3AUyTYkFwgcv1aym7pNm1Eq0poQQcMSAnmLb4f+6H113ZJUhnxCeU+lwomdP YVheLx2swBEmQq1GrwBP74qD/7G5C9geNJ1v7K64Nsldxk64pifPDXjHSLK+6xTR +afX4AEfN8PdHhjbSQJdlll2DZjEM4zHKQ7ZmtWBtYeJs/Hup/lO5uXyXSPVht3D AcOm+DpApy1nk+genYwP8XjpRftqREqrfNilFZU8seRyK1vqmwuOG8fWAqfKwGFG x7+Hf6c2rr8yjjyNYY5gZ4hhGoQsb+nwRgn4hKP6RGdEqtTclGI1/H1VuH9Ai7LK JPbBTcNMRzNGlif+xqOBlMzGAfNXTu2NqoZxDoXQ/bzg/QnHhCMUD0ciI04mUSdi jJRNLuIUanD8GIxLER5BkrNXzvWJ64a1DMrcSu12MJAGp1frTu5vJuPUQ2Kw5nQS 76OkHtBnXTNO0z+7kdcEnaZ31qV8ZMU7xV6z+06SlbpDuShrl5kQ8psBRXG3CwXN AP1MdmNxi4XKBPtZDjFx =KngQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
