On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > Your change will match any TERM value that starts with 'st', which seems > too loose. How about if we match st-256color instead? > -- > Thanks, > Zac >
Yes, you're right, though there's still one more issue with that. Although st-256color seems to be the default $TERM value for st (it is on my system and I don't recall changing it), there are a few other terminfo entries for st: $ ls -lah /usr/share/terminfo/s/st* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,2K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,4K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st-16color -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,3K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st-256color -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 856 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,0K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52-color lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52-m -> st52 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 562 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52-old lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stterm -> st lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stterm-16color -> st-16color lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stterm-256color -> st-256color -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 916 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stv52 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 848 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stv52pc Maybe we should be using the 'stterm' symlinks instead? -- Regards, Christoph
