On 16 Jan 2018 23:32, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Some ebuilds are a bit hard to fix their use of the network in src
> > phases, so allow them to disable things.  This allows us to turn off
> > access by default and for the vast majority while we work out how to
> > fix the few broken packages.
> 
> If we are going to allow network sandboxing to be disabled in
> individual ebuilds, we should also allow the other sandboxes to be
> disabled for the same reasons. sys-apps/sandbox has been notoriously
> buggy, for example.

that sandbox can already be disabled dynamically in ebuilds as needed.
i don't really see a reason for it to be a RESTRICT value.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to