On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:43:44 +0200 (CEST) "michael.lienhardt" <michael.lienha...@laposte.net> wrote:
> <div style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; > font-size:12px;">Dear all,<br> <br> > My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency > like ">=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in > virtual/libgudev-215-r3), since 'static-libs' is not a use flags of > sys-fs/udev-242, it is silently not considered during dependency > solving by emerge.<br> However, the PMS states:<br> - it is an > error for a use dependency to be applied to an ebuild which does not > have the flag in question in <span > class="ectt-1000">IUSE_REFERENCEABLE</span><br> - For EAPIs > listed in table <a > href="https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-56001r4";>5.4</a> > as not supporting profile defined <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE > </span>injection, <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE_REFERENCEABLE > </span>is equal to the calculated <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE > </span>value. For EAPIs where profile defined <span > class="ectt-1000">IUSE </span>injection is supported, <span > class="ectt-1000">IUSE_REFERENCEABLE </span>is equal to <span > class="ectt-1000">IUSE_EFFECTIVE<br> And 'static-libs' is not in the > IUSE_EFFECTIVE of </span>sys-fs/udev-242 (that ebuild has > EAPI=6).<br> So it seems to me that this current behavior of emerge > should be considered an error, no? Or the PMS should be updated?<br> > <br> Best,<br> Michael</div> Please do NOT send html emails. text only please
