On Saturday 25 February 2006 18:58, Mark Loeser wrote: > So, I am wondering how everyone feels about live CVS ebuilds in the > tree. I'd prefer that everyone did CVS snapshots, but I know that won't > happen overnight. The real problem that I have is live CVS ebuilds that > are not in package.mask. The handbook seems to encourage marking them > ~arch and not place them in package.mask, so I am curious how others > feel about it before bringing this up on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i dont think a hard rule will ever be appropriate -mike -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
