This issue is certainly a dicey one. I don't think there is an easy to define answer. It has always been assumed that a portage rewrite (whether it were a third party reimplementation in a !python language, or pkgcore/paludis or portage-ng) would just fit right into the tree, without making changes of any kind at all. So I think the question that we need to answer is *what* changes are necessary to the profiles and *why* -- or I suppose, why would paludis/pkgcore need to have its own profile?
I think it would be a lot easier to see what it is that needs this sort of change before we can make an informed call about it. thanks, Seemant -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
