On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:55:07 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > What this bug is about is rather the kind of errors that I've commented > on in [1], [2] and [3] which is that they _may_ be related to macros or > functions that are not declared/defined by the current set of library > dependencies, and would then lead to unresolved undefined symbols, and > thus, to runtime failure.
or: - the return value is larger than an "int", and thus possibly truncated - the func requires 3 args, but user passes some other number, and compiler cannot flag it - the user passes args in the incorrect order and the compiler cant check it -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
