Am Mittwoch 15 Februar 2006 02:36 schrieb Kerin Millar:
> On 15/02/06, Kerin Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > then they'll break. This library is provided by *either* gcc-3.3 (and
> > lower) OR the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 package. That's why the HOWTO
> > tells you to install libstdc++-v3 early. It makes the following kind
> > of operation safe for example:
> >
> >   # emerge libstdc++-v3 && emerge -C =gcc-3.3*
>
> I'd just like to say here that you can opt not to install libstdc++-v3
> and just keep a copy of gcc-3.3 if you want. I do because I sometimes
> need to compare the two versions when looking at certain packages with
> a view to SSP (-fstack-protector) compatibility. On the other hand, I
> spoke to one guy very recently who could not get one or two gnome
> packages on his desktop system to link to libstdc++.so.6 when
> upgrading although he swore that he had gcc-3.4.4 selected as the
> active compiler and everything seemed to check out. So I just told him
> to ensure that he was covered by libstdc++-v3 and remove gcc-3.3 then,
> lo and behold, the two packages built as expected thereafter.
>
> Therefore I would suggest following due procedure here and then
> building gcc-3.3 again *after* if you want to keep it around for some
> reason ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Kerin

Kerin,

thank you for your very detailed answer. I will definitely consider it, 
when I do the upgrade. But I think the other aspect of the problem (see 
my other post in this thread) is more important for gentoo users. I am 
still interested in any problem reports though.

Thanks and regards,
Timo
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to