On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 11:54, Brian Richardson wrote: > My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...). > I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something > else to blame?
Looks fine here. --- gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) gpg: Signature made Fri 22 Aug 2003 11:55:04 AM CDT using DSA key ID 06320418 gpg: Good signature from "Brian Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: C97B 61A2 E063 F1AE 4FFB 4F46 DA0D 283A 0632 0418 gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA1 ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
