I suggest a emerge bitchx >> output.txt.. Something tells me that its erroring out but 
not realizing it. openmosix-user did this to me when I was trying to figure out one 
day where my mtop was.. I had forgot to change the linux symbol and the configure was 
failing. For some reason, emerge doesn't always detect this. It then went ahead and 
installed openmosix-user with nothing. Which is what you got..



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayson Garrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Where the heck is Bitchx?
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 11:36, Eamon Caddigan wrote:
> > Jayson Garrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This morning I needed to get some info from irc so I 
> decided to fireup
> > > bitchx. I cannot find it on my system. Portage thinks it 
> is there...
> > 
> > I've had a similar problem with other ebuilds, but this 
> week's Gentoo
> > Weekly Newsletter has the solution: qpkg. Among other useful things,
> > qpkg can tell you what files were installed by a particular 
> ebuild with
> > 'qpkg --list <name of ebuild>'. No more sending the output 
> of emerge to
> > a file!
> > 
> > Thank you, GWN!
> > 
> > -Eamon
> 
> Well I have used qpkg in the past, but completly forgot about it this
> time. It doesn't look good. Seems as though emerge wnet through all of
> the motions of compiling and installing bitchx but didn't for some
> reason.
> 
> bash-2.05b# qpkg --list bitchx
> net-irc/bitchx-1.0.19-r6 *
> CONTENTS:
> 
> As you can see no files. Just for a test I did the same with xchat,
> mozilla and both came back with a nice list of what was installed. I
> guess this is a bug? I can file it on the gentoo bugzilla page, but
> before I do... Is anyone else seeing this issue?
> 
> Jayson Garrell
> 
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> 
> 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to