Does anyone else notice a siginificant difference in cpu usage between 2.4 and 2.6 kernels when it comes to disk I/O? It seems that 2.6 really seems to peg the CPU compared to 2.4. I'm using 2.6test9 by the way. Just curious if this is how things are supposed to be or not. Disk performance is really good according to hdparm: /dev/hdb: Timing buffer-cache reads: 1088 MB in 2.00 seconds = 544.00 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 134 MB in 3.02 seconds = 44.37 MB/sec
Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
