> > From what I've read, it's not a good idea to use async with nfs for > > mounting /usr/portage because file corruption could happen with multiple > > clients doing emerge sync. > > Well.. If your doing this in the first place. Your not really benefiting from > the idea anyway.. The idea is to only rsync with one server and all the > others just read it. Why in the hell would you rsync from more then on > server?
I wouldn't, just giving an example from what I read where file corruption could happen. > > So I'm thinking, is there anything wrong with having /usr/portage > > ro,async and havin distfile and packages rw,sync (ofcourse no longer as > > a subdirectory of /usr/portage)? > > This is actually the idea behind it. Is it really worth it though, will using async give me much better performance or should I just stick to sync for everything? Tom -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
