On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 16:15, Collins wrote: > On Saturday 27 December 2003 07:08, Tom Wesley wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just wondering on the general policy for replying to emails from this > > list. I have a tendency to hit the reply and let the email headers > > dictate where the mail goes. This does seem to have the disadvantage > > that replies to emails sent by people who have personally set a reply-to > > header in their client go directly to the person. > > > > As the Gentoo list does not replace this reply-to with an appropriate > > reply-to header I am thinking that I am correct in blindly continuing as > > I do, as I am in fact doing as has been requested and replying to the > > correct address. > > > > My point is that should the Gentoo list itself remove extra reply-to's > > and add one to ensure that the replies get sent to the list and not to > > personal mailboxes? > > Read up on this in the archives - discussed ad nauseam. Any decent mailer > (kmail, evolution, and sylpheed for sure) can reply automatically to the list > rather than the original sender.
I know that I *can* reply to the list - but surely if list policy is that I *should* then the list should enforce that by removing other reply-to's? -- Tom Wesley
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
