On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:33:03PM +0000, Mike Williams wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 09 February 2004 23:29, Alan wrote: > > I noticed that gcc 3.3 snuck into stable for x86 a few days ago with no > > fanfare... > > > > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.2-r5 [3.2.3-r3] > > > > Can I assume that upgrading is painless? The move from 3.1 to 3.2 was > > pretty bad IIRC due to binary incompatibility or something, but I'd like > > to know if it's safe to upgrade without b0rking my server. > > If you do get any bad behaviour, run ldconfig. > All fine here.
Good to hear, thanks! I just get kinda nervous sometimes with "big" upgrades like this :) alan -- Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://arcterex.net -------------------------------------------------------------------- "There are only 3 real sports: bull-fighting, car racing and mountain climbing. All the others are mere games." -- Hemingway -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list