On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 15:19, Linux Gentoo wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:54:28 +0100 > Jens Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the words: > > > * On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 16:42:44 +0100, Spider wrote: > > >> Gimp 1.2 is based on gtk+-1.2.10, which is not capable of any > > >> antialiasing. You have to emerge the "unstable" version of Gimp > > >> (actually 2.0_pre2), which is compiled against gtk+-2.2.4 and > > >> therefore can use antialiased fonts. > > > > > Actually its not that unstable, but some issues remain with linking > > > inconsistencies when upgrading inside gimp-pre versions. > > > > You are absolutely right, I use the developer series of gimp myself a > > few months now and I'm pretty happy with it. That's why I put > > "unstable" in quotes. ;) > > Right on, actually, I have wanted to try the 2.0 version of GIMP. I > have been hearing good things about it. Two questions if you please. > > 1. Do I enter the command > emerge gimp-2.0_pre2 > in order to build & install? > > 2. Will GIMP 2 exist along side GIMP 1.2 or must I remove 1.2. If they > do exist side by side, what is the executable for 2 called... I mean > 1.2 already has 'gimp', so what happens there? > > Thank you very much for the information. > > Adrian
They are slotted, so live happily together, the gimp-2 binary is called gimp-1.3 -- Tom Wesley
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
