On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:00:34PM +0000, Calvin Spealman wrote: > On 5/3/05, Travis Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why not the sender's for now? > > Why not the recipient's for now? One could almost argue free speech > for expressing one's self in HTML, but I won't go there.
let's not let politics get into it. > > If the sender disables HTML, no one gets it. If the recipient disables > HTML, then everyone gets what everyone wants. > if sender uses multipart/alternate MIME, everybody gets what everyone wants. Besides, if you've already wasted bandwidth on HTML tags, whats a little big more for a copy of the plain text? q= W -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Address: 45 Spelman Hall, Princeton University 08544 * * Phone: x68958 AIM: AngularJerk * * E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: sep.dynalias.net * ---------------------------------------------------------------- The only skills I have the patience to learn are those that have no real application in life. -- Calvin Sortir en Pantoufles: up 22 days, 2:51 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
