On 5/31/05, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any chance you can post the full output of the setup > > command? Maybe > > there is a clue in there... > > Yikes! Now I get > > Error 12: Invalid device requested > > so much different from > > > grub> setup (hd0) > Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes > Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes > Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes > Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)"... 22 > sectors are embedded. > succeeded > Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+22 p > (hd0,1)/boot/grub/stage2 / > boot/grub/menu.lst"... succeeded > Done. > > of May26, which, I was informed, is also wrong, but > obviously for a different reason. > > But I just checked. I exited out of /bin/bash, did a > list /mnt/gentoo, found all as it should be. > > And when I chroot / is there as if I had booted > normally. And so is /boot. > > Makes no sense. > > According to one respondent /etc/mtab might be worth a > look. > > livecd / # less /etc/mtab > /dev/ROOT / xfs rw,noatime 0 0 > /dev/hda2 /boot ext2 rw,noatime 0 0 > /dev/fd0 /floppy msdos rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0 > /dev/fd0 /floppy msdos rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0 > > hmmm, that's strange; /dev/ROOT(hda4) is not xfs, it > should be reiserfs. And when it was mounted the > console noted that it *was* reiserfs. But /boot is > correct. Or is it that mtab just lists defaults? But I > notice that once I've chroot'ed I can mount drives > according to the options listed in the fstab I wrote > during the install. > > It's all a darkness. > > -mw > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail > Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: > http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > maybe you can try this, root (hd0,1) setup (hd0)
-- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
