On Monday 19 April 2010 20:20:27 you wrote: > On Monday 19 April 2010 21:07:47 Mick wrote: > > On Monday 19 April 2010 15:49:34 Grant Edwards wrote: > > > On 2010-04-19, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > > > > On 2010-04-18 6:27 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > >> On Sunday 18 April 2010 22:06:44 Mick wrote: > > > >>> I was reminded that I do not understand sendmail enough for my > > > >>> liking. > > > >> > > > >> Does anybody? > > > > > > > ><flame-protect> > > > > > > > > That's why Wietse invented postfix. > > > > > > > ></flame-protect> > > > > > > I gave up on sendmail about 12 years ago and switched to qmail and/or > > > postfix. I didn't know anybody was still using sendmail. Is it the > > > default MTA for any of the popular Linux distros? > > > > I am not sure if it is a default MTA but I have a CentOS server which > > comes with it. I guess it's one of these masochistic things that either > > decide to completely avoid learning (like emacs?!) or once you start you > > don't want to let it beat you! :-)) > > I recall this old quip: > > You are not a real Unix sysadmin till you have written a sendmail.cf by > hand. You are insane to attempt it twice. > > ;-)
He, he! I thought it went along the lines of: "He who has never hacked sendmail.cf has no soul; he who has hacked sendmail.cf more than once has no brain." - Old Hacker Proverb -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
