On 6/2/10, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > smoker-new ~ # smartctl -l selftest /dev/hdb > smartctl version 5.38 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen > Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 > Num Test_Description Status Remaining > LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error > # 1 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 1038 - > # 2 Short offline Completed without error 00% > 1037 - > # 3 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 1075 - > # 4 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 305 - > # 5 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 660 - > # 6 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 213 - > # 7 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 687 - > # 8 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 686 - > # 9 Extended offline Completed without error 00% > 629 -
I was thinking about smartctl -A attributes table (or just plain -a for all), which might've showed a great number of sector relocations or other internal I/O-related issues. But this report raises another question: why aren't the reported lifetimes in an ascending list? They jump back and forth. -- Arttu V.
