Apparently, though unproven, at 00:04 on Friday 19 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly:
> On Thursday 18 November 2010 20:26:36 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:10 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Mick > > did > > > > opine thusly: > > > I have installed E17 using layman and the efl overlay, but today I just > > > ran dispatch-conf and these changes showed up: > > > ========================================= > > > --- /etc/portage/package.use 2010-11-15 12:50:46.000000000 +0000 > > > +++ /etc/portage/._cfg0000_package.use 2010-11-18 19:35:35.000000000 > > > +0000 @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ > > > > > > net-wireless/bluez gstreamer pcmcia > > > app-portage/layman subversion > > > #entrance > > > > > > -x11-libs/evas X jpeg png svg xpm > > > -x11-libs/ecore X curl > > > +media-libs/evas X jpeg png svg xpm > > > +dev-libs/ecore X curl > > > > > > #E17 > > > > > > -x11-libs/e_dbus X > > > -x11-libs/evas X jpeg png svg xpm fontconfig > > > +dev-libs/e_dbus X > > > +media-libs/evas X jpeg png svg xpm fontconfig > > > > > > #efl overlay > > > dev-libs/ecore glib threads xim curl ssl inotify evas opengl X > > > xinerama > > > > > > xprint xscreensaver -sdl -gnutls > > > > > > dev-libs/eet ssl threads -gnutls > > > > > > >> (1 of 1) -- /etc/portage/package.use > > > >> q quit, h help, n next, e edit-new, z zap-new, u use-new > > > >> > > > m merge, t toggle-merge, l look-merge: > > > ========================================= > > > > > > Why is this? Do I want to accept these changes? I am not sure if they > > > are caused by layman or portage proper. > > > > You have a mixture of vapier's overlay from layman and barberi's overlay > > from enlightenment.org, evas and ecore changed category from x11-libs to > > dev-libs in barberi's overlay. You can't have both, they conflict. Do > > this: > > > > delete the vapier overlay - it's WAAAAAAAAAAAAY outdated > > accept conf-update changes related to e17 > > install the efl overlay from enlightenment.org - it's currently > > maintained delete any and all e17 packages. > > emerge @e17 > > > > keep in mind for the future that you can't update the e17 packages why > > they are at version 9999. You must update the entire lot, in order, > > anytime you want to update anything. This is normal for -9999 packages > > Thank you Alan, I seem to recall that at one point I did try Vapier's > overlay, but it didn't work and then you kindly suggested that I used > this: > > $ layman -l > * efl [Subversion] > (http://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/packaging/gentoo > > Now, when I try to delete vapier's I get this: > > # layman -d enlightenment > * Overlay "enlightenment" does not exist. > > Am I right then to assume that it is no longer installed? > > $ ls -la /var/lib/layman/ > total 158 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 8 Nov 1 20:10 . > drwxr-xr-x 32 root root 36 Nov 18 19:14 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 154200 Nov 18 21:21 > cache_ac494f50f5736be7871962c0dec7b3bb.xml > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 379 Nov 18 21:06 > cache_f4870c06236b316a7c7915b9c5fa4960.xml > drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 21 Nov 18 20:08 efl > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 1 20:10 .keep_app-portage_layman-0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 57 Jun 11 07:23 make.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 480 Jun 11 07:23 overlays.xml > > So I *should* be safe to accept the changes that dispatch-conf suggests, > right? Now there's another confusion. This just got committed to the efl overlay: http://cia.vc/stats/project/e/.message/1897db5 Note that the dev says we should be moving back to the enlightenment overlay :-) With all these changes it's hard to give firm advice, except to say this: If conf-update wants to make changes to package categories, and eix on your machine gives the same new ones as the new config file, then make the change. Otherwise find out why you are out of step. having said that, yes it does look like you have enlightenment overlay uninstalled and the efl one installed. And it looks like you are now going to switch them back around again. Life on the bleeding edge is fun, right? -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
