Apparently, though unproven, at 04:13 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Kevin O'Gorman did opine thusly:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Adam Carter <adamcart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect. > > >>> > >> >>> If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7, > >> >>> removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing... > > > > Sounds to me like that should be made into a feature request. What does > > the list think? If there's support I will log it. > > +1 It bit me, and just seems stupid. +1 I like Neil's suggestion - eselect can put packages it knows about into a specially-named set. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
