Apparently, though unproven, at 18:40 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Stéphane 
Guedon did opine thusly:

> 16:05 root@luciole /boot # mount
> rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
> /dev/root on / type ext3 (rw,commit=0)
> proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> rc-svcdir on /lib64/rc/init.d type tmpfs
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=1024k,mode=755)
> sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,relatime,size=10240k,mode=755)
> devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620)
> shm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> /dev/sda6 on /home type ext4 (rw,commit=0)
> 
> Is debugfs usefull ? If not, is there a way not to mount it ?

deslect it in kernel config

It's not something you mount like a regular disk-based fs


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Reply via email to