Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2012, 06:00:00 schrieb Dale: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:26:02 -0600 > > > > Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Howdy, > >> > >> I ran across this and though it was a joke. Did a news search and > >> sure enough, it is reported in lots of places. Random linky: > >> > >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102856/Will-FBI-shut-Internet-Ma > >> rch-8-virus-concerns.html?ito=feeds-newsxml > >> > >> Is there any truth to this mess? My bigger and better question, how > >> is shutting down the internet going to fix this? When the net comes > >> back up, they are still going to be infected. Right? > >> > >> I'm glad I run a really nice Linux OS. > > > > Gawd, I hate it when morons write sensational articles that attempt to > > make sense to other morons. You get crap like that. > > > > So if this is legit, and I'm not saying it is, what happened is this: > > > > The malware changes the DNS cache settings on infected machines, > > sending the user to rogue caches. The FBI captured some (or all) of > > these rogue caches and (possibly) tried to fix them. A court has now > > said those rogue caches must now be shut down. > > > > So if the morons reading the article do nothing, on March 8 the DNS > > caches they use will be down. The user's DNS will not work. > > > > OMFG!!!!!!! Da intartubes is broken!!!!! > > > > <sigh> > > > > Instead, why not just set the DNS caches to something NOT owned by Ivan > > The Russian Spammer? > > > > And no, the intartubes will NOT be switched off. > > I don't really think they can unless they just cut power to all the > computers. After all, the internet is supposed to be redundant right? > If there is a few computers still running that have a connection, it is > still working. Sort of anyway. > > Does make one wonder tho. They have been talking about having a > internet "off switch" but I'm not sure it would be that easy.
basically, yes. Take down the core routers and backbones and everything falls apart. -- #163933
