On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:50:47 +0100 Hartmut Figge <h.fi...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Thanasis: > >on 02/18/2012 06:57 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following: > > >> [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice > >> * app-office/libreoffice > >> > >> Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 > >> merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. > > > >Impressive. > > Yes. Perhaps i should consider using the source myself, because of > > hafi@i5_64 ~ $ loffice > /usr/bin/loffice: line 2: 12258 Illegal instruction > /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice "$@" > > which i just got with an i5. Should i? Should i wait for a fixed > libreoffice-bin? Hm. The case for compiling libreoffice is getting better all the time. Even on older slower machines, build time is gradually coming down as the ebuild maintainers strip out all the bundled libs that Sun added and use system libs instead. The days of >12 hour compiles for OOo are long gone (thankfully) -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
